I haven’t been on this website for very long, but in that short period of time I’ve learned a few things…some good, some bad. First of all there are A LOT of voyeurs out there just kicking the tires, checking out profiles, collecting pictures, and ohhing & ahhing at the videos. Second of all, there are many women who are interested in emailing but never meeting. They might take highly erotic selfies, but it seems to be more for exhibitionist purposes. Thirdly, there are a number of ‘Bots’ that constantly send out feelers for the next available orgy. Finally, there tend to be many members from far off places looking for sugar daddies. Nothing is perfect, and all-in-all this IS a good site. Mostly REAL, upfront people. The few I’ve met have been very nice and are the rea why I stay on hoping to find new exciting connections. I hope my comments give you a feel for what I’m looking for too. If not, let me be honest: •I am REAL. You want proof? Meet me in a public spot for a simple coffee or lunch. Bring a friend or a body guard or an attack or whatever...but don’t waste my time by hemming and hawing about more proof. I understand we ALL need to be safe, but come on…if you want an FBI background check what are you doing on this site anyway? Besides, who is to say YOU are who you say YOU are? •I am NOT a deviant, felon, pervert, photo collector, voyeur, weirdo, etc… I do not have a criminal background, and I hope you don’t either. •I WILL NOT send you a dick pic. If you want that, this site has thousands of those morons. Have at ‘em and collect away, but I won’t be part of it. If that is what you’re into, believe it or not there are tons of free porn sites! •I WILL NOT be your sugar daddy. If the purpose of your interest is to seek financial support, you need to move on. •While there are many interesting, beautiful women outside of the St. Louis area, its not very likely we’ll ever have the chance to get together. Please don’t contact me if you’re not within 100 miles and are willing to meet somewhere in-between. •I am looking for strong, independent, self-reliant, kick-ass, ‘take no priers,’ type A women who know what they want. Please don’t waste my time, or yours, by endless emails. You want to talk? I’d love to, but let’s do it in per. Perally, I am very easy going and have a very happy, optimistic demeanor. Most of my friends would say I have a very outgoing perality. I exercise about 4 times per week, and expect my sex partners to be at about the same fitness level. I hate using bars are pick up spots. I don’t mind meeting friends there, but you’ll never find me there to go home with someone. I love sex, and I am interested in an passionate ‘erotic partnership’ in the bedroom where both of us get what we want. However, that needs to happen, I am game! Let’s have FUN!

My Ideal Person I am straight and looking for someone who is educated, takes care of themself physically, and not afraid to show their passion. I prefer a discrete relationship since I value my privacy and respect the privacy of others. While I don't consider myself overly kinky, I am always open to try new things (places, toys, roles...). I definitely prefer sensuality and foreplay. My thought is that anything worthwhile, is worthwhile being done right. I like to take my time and maximize our pleasure.

What location do you fantasize about for a sexual encounter?:
A bed, The beach, A moving vehicle (i.e. car), The middle of a park, A dark back alley, A movie theatre, A remote wilderness spot, My desk at work, A store dressing room, A hotel room

What types of sexual activities turn you on?:
Giving Oral Sex, Receiving Oral Sex, Role Playing, Threesomes, Mutual Masturbation, Leather, Latex, Massage

What factors are most important to you when looking for a sexual partner?:
Sexual experience, Physical attraction, Same/similar fetishes, Ability to be discreet, Sexual appetite, Willingness to freely discuss and try anything, Agreeable to a commitment free sexual relationship, Creativity/Kinkiness level

Have you ever had cybersex?:
No way. I only want skin on skin.

View more of rwstl's responses